saturation of the latest technologies is expressed in months as opposed to years. identifying and seizing opportunity while retaining the structural factors required to weather change. the speed at which consumers are adapting to new technology is a positive sign of the dynamism that characterises a vibrant consumer- oriented market economy. and in today’s hyper-competitive economy, the process of market disruption, which is happening at an ever- increasing rate, is being driven by the endless pursuit of sales and profits. this pursuit is realised only through innovation and adaptability. without it, a company stands very little chance and no company has immunity. with it, the ability of a company to remove itself from its economic context and resist the economic gravity of bankruptcy improves significantly. and to get it, a company needs to be agile and absorptive. agile absorption in his book the upside of turbulence: seizing opportunity in an uncertain world, professor donald sull sets the scene of an agile absorber in the deep jungle of zaire, africa. the famous 1974 “rumble in the jungle” boxing match between george foreman and muhammad ali epitomises the agile and absorptive characteristics that businesses require: the agility of ali, which enabled him to spot opportunity and exploit it before his opponent could, seemed no match for foreman’s ability to absorb blows before landing his own counter- blow. agility and absorption are not mutually exclusive. ali showed at the rumble in the jungle that true champions have the ability to combine both to achieve agile absorption. this is the capability of achieving absorption businesses can build absorption in a number of ways. the obvious lever of age and size goes hand in hand. a business that has been around long enough and that has grown big enough, may pass the threshold of “too big to fail”. when sheer scale raises the cost of failure for government, banks, customers and unions, incentives may become too high to allow failure. this is the worst type of absorption, and one that investors should avoid. other ways of fostering absorption come in the form of diversified cash flows, significant cash reserves, high customer switching costs, low operational/fixed costs, loyal customers and a powerful brand. general motors (gm) is a good example of how both sheer size and diversified cash flows make a business absorptive. gm accounted for 50% of motor vehicle sales in the us in the 1950s and its large asset base and domestic market share has allowed it to survive as long as it has. as more agile competitors, such as honda and toyota, eroded gm’s market share, the business was able to survive purely on reducing costs, discontinuing brands and selling off some of the "jewels" it had built up over the years through its diversification efforts. these include the likes of terex, frigidaire, raytheon and eds. historically, businesses would often stockpile inventories as a form of protection to ensure smooth supply during economic fluctuations. today, this may be viewed as an inefficient use of working capital, or worse, maintaining a lazy balance sheet. a growing cash pile is currently viewed as a more efficient way of building absorption. this will likely never ring more true than it has during the covid-19 economic shutdowns. unfortunately, shareholders wishing to maximise returns will call for cash to either be returned to them via dividends or share buy-backs, or alternatively to be reinvested into the business. shortly after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, brazilian aeroplane manufacturer, embraer’s customers declined the delivery of us$500 million worth of aircraft. fortunately, the business had a significant cash balance, which effectively ensured its survival post 9/11. european rival, fairchild dornier was not as lucky. today, embraer still manufactures aircraft solely because of its absorptive ability due to its cash-rich balance sheet. alternative forms of latent slack, such as excess employees and managers, can also translate into increased absorptive capacity. in times of stress, costs can be removed with little impact on the business’ operations and output. however, much like size, this is not an efficient form of absorption. switching costs is a very powerful absorber. microsoft is an excellent example of a company that maintains loyal customers partly due to high switching costs. it would be remiss not to mention the fact that microsoft produces quality products, which is likely the first and foremost reason for its loyal customer base. however, the cost to switch from a microsoft operating system to a competing one is likely too high for many consumers. as a result, the profitable core business of microsoft has allowed it to expand into new opportunities, displaying 9